raw · papers · ingested 2026-09-19
Lessons Learned from the Habanero EGS Project (Hogarth & Holl, GRC Transactions 2017)
Source: https://publications.mygeoenergynow.org/grc/1033770.pdf
Provenance: Operator-side post-mortem (Hogarth Energy Resources; University of Queensland) in GRC Transactions 2017. The best-documented commercial EGS failure: technically working, economically dead. Retrieved via research agent; full text extracted with pdftotext.
Project outline
- 2000–2016, Geodynamics Ltd., Innamincka Granite, Cooper Basin, South Australia. Six deep wells; rock 230–264 °C; gradient 31 °C/km. Hundreds of millions of AUD spent.
- 1 MWe-class binary pilot plant ran 160 days in 2013, generating only enough to power the reinjection pump, camp and ancillaries.
- Verdict: “despite the technical success of the project, it failed to satisfy key economic measures and the entire project is now in the process of being abandoned.”
Lessons
- “Hot rocks are not dry.” The granite fault was overpressured by ~34.5 MPa (5,000 psi). Habanero-1 kicked, lost 250 m³ of heavy mud, needed a 69 MPa BOP and 15.2–15.6 ppg mud; every later well had similar problems.
- One fault, not a fracture network. Almost all flow in all four wells came from the Habanero Fault (~6 m intensely fractured zone, 1 m cavern, dipping 10° WSW). Most natural fractures are closed (Rittershoffen analogue: <3% of observed fractures permeable). The planned “3-D volume of interconnected joint sets” did not exist.
- Stimulation needs pre-existing open, critically stressed structures. Jolokia-1: 591 m of open granite held at 69 MPa surface / 116–122 MPa downhole (above minimum principal stress) for 14 days, yet injection averaged 1 L/s with 73 microseismic events — “there were no open fractures with high slip likelihood in the entire 591 metres.”
- Seismicity is intrinsic. First events at Habanero-4 occurred only 2 MPa above baseline pressure; the fault is critically stressed. Small-volume stimulations (2.2–2.5 ML water) raised productivity 5 → 25 kg/s/MPa. “Induced seismicity is related to long-term hydraulic enhancement and is unavoidable in a successful stimulation.”
- Circulation stayed pilot-scale. 15.7 kg/s max at 212 °C (2008–09, 560 m spacing, 61,000 t circulated); 19 kg/s max at 215 °C (2013, 690 m spacing, 165,000 t). Commercial EGS targets are 50–100+ kg/s per well. Output was thermally stable during tests, but a single-fault reservoir meant recoverable energy far below plan.
Key quotes
- “However, despite the technical success of the project, it failed to satisfy key economic measures and the entire project is now in the process of being abandoned.”
- “Nevertheless, injection rates averaged only 1 L/s (0.4 bbl/min) and only 73 seismic events were detected during the stimulation.”
Relevance to the cooling wiki
Habanero is the counter-case to Fervo: same “engineer a reservoir in hot granite” pitch, but relying on natural fracture networks and open-hole bullhead stimulation. Fervo’s later success with cemented casing and propped multi-stage fractures is best read as a response to exactly these failure modes. It also shows that a 230 °C resource is worthless as drive heat if it cannot be circulated at scale.